SMVTX vs. FASPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX).
SMVTX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Nov 30, 2001. FASPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 20, 1986.
Performance
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 6.38% | 17.58% | 18.93% | 10.94% | -13.89% | 29.15% | -1.19% | 33.14% | -8.01% | 11.69% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 3.31% | 7.76% | -2.60% | 19.93% | -7.82% | 32.65% | 7.70% | 33.85% | -17.27% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMVTX achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FASPX's 3.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SMVTX has outperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 11.07%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.33% annualized return.
SMVTX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 31.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
FASPX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMVTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMVTX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank
SMVTX
FASPX
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMVTX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 0.94 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.46 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.25 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 5.06 | +4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMVTX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 0.94 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.31 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.43 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMVTX and FASPX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison
SMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.45%, more than FASPX's 9.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund | 15.45% | 16.44% | 15.96% | 1.16% | 6.75% | 18.53% | 2.52% | 5.82% | 14.47% | 20.86% | 3.61% | 7.05% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 9.02% | 9.32% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 1.93% | 7.80% | 0.55% | 4.98% | 15.67% | 7.26% | 21.61% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMVTX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVTX and FASPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMVTX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.72% | -70.11% | +15.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -15.26% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -34.53% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.45% | -48.02% | +2.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | -9.84% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -9.87% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.76% | -0.77% |
Volatility
SMVTX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) at 5.25%. This indicates that SMVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMVTX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.25% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 12.52% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.82% | 22.49% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 20.62% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 21.96% | -1.39% |