PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMVTX vs. FASPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMVTX having a 21.96% return and FASPX slightly lower at 20.91%. Over the past 10 years, SMVTX has outperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


SMVTX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.08%
YTD
21.96%
6M
20.54%
1Y
44.60%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
12.25%

FASPX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.31%
YTD
20.91%
6M
22.01%
1Y
40.34%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
21.96%17.58%18.93%10.94%-13.89%29.15%-1.19%33.14%-8.01%11.69%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
20.91%7.76%-2.60%19.93%-7.82%32.65%7.70%33.85%-17.27%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SMVTX and FASPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.92

The correlation between SMVTX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMVTX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMVTX
SMVTX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SMVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FASPX
FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMVTXFASPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.22

4.06

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.89

15.00

+7.89

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMVTX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMVTXFASPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.37

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.38

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.48

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMVTX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVTX and FASPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMVTXFASPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.72%

-70.11%

+15.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-9.84%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-34.53%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-34.53%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.45%

-48.02%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-9.83%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.66%

-0.72%

Volatility

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) at 4.09%. This indicates that SMVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMVTXFASPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.09%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

11.91%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

16.98%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.45%

20.68%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

22.00%

-1.36%

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMVTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMVTX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

SMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, more than FASPX's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
7.71%9.32%0.00%2.40%1.93%7.80%0.55%4.98%15.67%7.26%21.61%0.80%
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
13.48%16.44%15.96%1.16%6.75%18.53%2.52%5.82%14.47%20.86%3.61%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMVTX and FASPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMVTX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FASPX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMVTX dropped -54.72% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

SMVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMVTX and FASPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer