SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)) and CAUS.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SMVP.TO is passively managed, while CAUS.TO is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMVP.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CAUS.TO.

Performance

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMVP.TO

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 4.89%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAUS.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)	-4.77%
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SMVP.TO and CAUS.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026	0.46

Return for Risk

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMVP.TO

SMVP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 27
SMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SMVP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SMVP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SMVP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SMVP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMVP.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMVP.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	2.61	-2.23

Drawdowns

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, which is greater than CAUS.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVP.TO and CAUS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMVP.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.11%	-6.25%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	-0.31%	-5.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-1.68%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMVP.TO	CAUS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.08%	15.54%	-5.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	15.54%	-2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.16%	15.54%	-2.38%

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUS.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMVP.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Dividend Comparison

SMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while CAUS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)	2.26%	1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMVP.TO and CAUS.TO in my portfolio?

SMVP.TO and CAUS.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMVP.TO or CAUS.TO?

On fees, SMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMVP.TO or CAUS.TO?

SMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for CAUS.TO.

What is the main difference between SMVP.TO and CAUS.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SMVP.TO and 0.19% for CAUS.TO.