SMUP vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMUP (T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMUP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

SMUP vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMUP achieves a -56.52% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.18% return.

SMUP

• 1D: -5.76%
• 1M: -7.99%
• YTD: -56.52%
• 6M: -84.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMUP vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMUP T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF	-56.52%	-95.72%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.18%	7.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SMUP and QTJL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

SMUP vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMUP vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMUP	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	0.52	-1.01

Drawdowns

SMUP vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMUP drawdown since its inception was -98.64%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMUP and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMUP	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.64%	-33.40%	-65.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.14%	0.00%	-98.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.25%	-7.93%	-71.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMUP	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.27%	9.99%	+193.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.27%	20.42%	+182.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.27%	20.42%	+182.85%

SMUP vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMUP vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

SMUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.96%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%
SMUP T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF	51.96%	22.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMUP and QTJL in my portfolio?

SMUP and QTJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMUP or QTJL?

On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMUP or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SMUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMUP or QTJL?

SMUP has the higher dividend yield at 51.96%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between SMUP and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SMUP and 0.79% for QTJL.