SMUP vs. GLWG
SMUP (T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF) and GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMUP is actively managed, while GLWG is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMUP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GLWG.
Performance
SMUP vs. GLWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMUP
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -56.52%
- 6M
- -84.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLWG
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 39.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMUP vs. GLWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMUP T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF | -24.72% |
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 80.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMUP and GLWG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMUP vs. GLWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMUP | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 7.40 | -7.89 |
Drawdowns
SMUP vs. GLWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMUP drawdown since its inception was -98.64%, which is greater than GLWG's maximum drawdown of -29.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMUP and GLWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMUP | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.64% | -29.53% | -69.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -12.84% | -85.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.25% | -10.74% | -68.51% |
Volatility
SMUP vs. GLWG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMUP | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 203.27% | 150.03% | +53.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 203.27% | 150.03% | +53.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 203.27% | 150.03% | +53.24% |
SMUP vs. GLWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLWG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMUP vs. GLWG - Dividend Comparison
SMUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.96%, while GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMUP T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF | 51.96% | 22.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMUP and GLWG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SMUP.
SMUP has the higher dividend yield at 51.96%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SMUP and 0.75% for GLWG.
Find the right allocation for SMUP and GLWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer