SMU vs. RGTU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMU returned -99.22% vs -79.08% for RGTU. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

SMU vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -84.70% return, which is significantly lower than RGTU's -78.33% return.

SMU

• 1D: -16.70%
• 1M: -44.43%
• 6M: -90.92%
• YTD: -84.70%
• 1Y: -99.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGTU

• 1D: -15.85%
• 1M: -56.43%
• 6M: -82.18%
• YTD: -78.33%
• 1Y: -79.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMU vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-84.70%	-91.57%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-78.33%	45.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SMU and RGTU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.65

The correlation between SMU and RGTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMU vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMU

SMU Risk / Return Rank: 2
SMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SMU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 7
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMU vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMU	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	-0.38	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.02	0.41	-2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.04	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	-0.81	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	-1.02	-0.16

SMU vs. RGTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMU Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the RGTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMU and RGTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMU vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, roughly equal to the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMU	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.35%	-97.58%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.35%	-97.58%	-1.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.35%	-97.58%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.19%	-65.56%	-12.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	83.46%	77.19%	+6.27%

Volatility

SMU vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) have volatilities of 44.07% and 43.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMU	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.07%	43.95%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.95%	141.20%	-8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	199.44%	218.60%	-19.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.29%	216.05%	-15.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.29%	216.05%	-15.76%

SMU vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMU and RGTU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

SMU vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

SMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 95.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	95.20%	20.63%
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMU and RGTU in my portfolio?

SMU and RGTU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMU or RGTU?

SMU has higher volatility (44.07%) compared to RGTU (43.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMU dropped -99.35% vs RGTU's -97.58%.

Which ETF is better, SMU or RGTU?

On 1-year performance, RGTU leads with -79.08% vs -99.22% for SMU. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, RGTU has been the lower-risk option at 43.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMU or RGTU?

Over the 1-year period, RGTU has performed better with a -79.08% return vs -99.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMU or RGTU?

SMU and RGTU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMU or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 95.20%, compared with 0.00% for SMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.