SMU vs. QUBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

SMU vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -57.47% return, which is significantly lower than QUBX's -26.52% return.

SMU

• 1D: -5.18%
• 1M: -9.35%
• YTD: -57.47%
• 6M: -84.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUBX

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 18.69%
• YTD: -26.52%
• 6M: -61.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMU vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-57.47%	-92.36%
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-26.52%	-81.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SMU and QUBX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

SMU vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMU	QUBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	-0.44	-0.04

Drawdowns

SMU vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -98.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and QUBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMU	QUBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.68%	-96.40%	-2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.20%	-91.08%	-7.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.98%	-69.80%	-6.18%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMU	QUBX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.70%	200.33%	+3.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.70%	200.33%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.70%	200.33%	+3.37%

SMU vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMU and QUBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

SMU vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMU nor QUBX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMU and QUBX in my portfolio?

SMU and QUBX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMU or QUBX?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMU or QUBX?

SMU and QUBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMU or QUBX?

SMU and QUBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.