SMU vs. LITX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.

Performance

SMU vs. LITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMU

• 1D: -5.18%
• 1M: -9.35%
• YTD: -57.47%
• 6M: -84.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LITX

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -18.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMU vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-74.72%
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	335.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SMU and LITX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

SMU vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMU	LITX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	32.05	-32.53

Drawdowns

SMU vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -98.68%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and LITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMU	LITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.68%	-51.46%	-47.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.20%	-25.05%	-73.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.98%	-14.60%	-61.38%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMU	LITX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.70%	198.92%	+4.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.70%	198.92%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.70%	198.92%	+4.78%

SMU vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMU vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMU nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMU and LITX in my portfolio?

SMU and LITX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMU or LITX?

On fees, SMU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMU or LITX?

SMU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMU or LITX?

SMU and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SMU and LITX?

Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 1.49% for LITX.