PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMU vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMU vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -57.47% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -2.98% return.


SMU

1D
-5.18%
1M
-9.35%
YTD
-57.47%
6M
-84.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
0.56%
1M
5.41%
YTD
-2.98%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMU vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMU and IFED is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMU vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMU

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMU vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMU vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMUIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.65

-1.13

Drawdowns

SMU vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -98.68%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMUIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.68%

-22.36%

-76.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.20%

-4.97%

-93.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.98%

-5.84%

-70.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

Volatility

SMU vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMUIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.70%

16.18%

+187.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.70%

19.87%

+183.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.70%

19.87%

+183.83%

SMU vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMU vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMU nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMU and IFED have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SMU.

SMU and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 0.45% for IFED.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMU and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer