PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMTSX vs. DRIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund (SMTSX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTSX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than DRIKX's 12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SMTSX has underperformed DRIKX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while DRIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.


SMTSX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.75%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.96%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
10.21%

DRIKX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.02%
YTD
12.38%
6M
13.14%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMTSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund
8.48%16.50%10.60%21.23%-17.97%15.76%14.94%24.06%-9.63%21.76%
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.38%19.29%17.19%21.26%-15.32%21.28%14.20%25.63%-9.16%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTSX and DRIKX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between SMTSX and DRIKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMTSX vs. DRIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTSX
SMTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SMTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIKX
DRIKX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DRIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund (SMTSX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMTSXDRIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.66

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

16.03

-4.74

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DRIKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTSX and DRIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMTSXDRIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.81

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.80

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.81

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Drawdowns

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTSX drawdown since its inception was -51.41%, which is greater than DRIKX's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTSX and DRIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMTSXDRIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.41%

-33.48%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.59%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.23%

-16.02%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

-23.49%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-33.48%

+2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-4.24%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.89%

-0.04%

Volatility

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund (SMTSX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMTSXDRIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.11%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

8.69%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

11.20%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

14.83%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.43%

15.75%

-1.32%

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIKX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMTSX vs. DRIKX - Dividend Comparison

SMTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than DRIKX's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.31%1.24%2.44%3.19%3.92%2.37%2.41%2.12%2.27%1.18%1.39%0.00%
SMTSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund
5.33%5.78%4.87%1.87%10.16%17.65%4.83%11.47%6.11%4.10%2.89%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMTSX and DRIKX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMTSX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to DRIKX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTSX dropped -51.41% vs DRIKX's -33.48%.

DRIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMTSX and DRIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer