PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMTSX vs. DRIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund (SMTSX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTSX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than DRIJX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SMTSX has underperformed DRIJX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while DRIJX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.


SMTSX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.75%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.96%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
10.21%

DRIJX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.70%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.43%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMTSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund
8.48%16.50%10.60%21.23%-17.97%15.76%14.94%24.06%-9.63%21.76%
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
11.69%19.64%17.05%21.37%-15.25%21.63%14.09%25.59%-9.14%21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTSX and DRIJX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between SMTSX and DRIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMTSX vs. DRIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTSX
SMTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SMTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIJX
DRIJX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund (SMTSX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMTSXDRIJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.47

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

15.69

-4.39

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DRIJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTSX and DRIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMTSXDRIJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.74

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.81

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.81

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Drawdowns

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTSX drawdown since its inception was -51.41%, which is greater than DRIJX's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTSX and DRIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMTSXDRIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.41%

-33.55%

-17.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.12%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.23%

-15.25%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

-23.49%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-33.55%

+2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-4.19%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.78%

+0.07%

Volatility

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund (SMTSX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) at 2.92%. This indicates that SMTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMTSXDRIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.92%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

8.23%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

10.30%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

14.56%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.43%

15.63%

-1.20%

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIJX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMTSX vs. DRIJX - Dividend Comparison

SMTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than DRIJX's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.27%2.49%2.53%3.40%3.98%2.87%4.15%2.18%2.29%1.25%1.40%0.00%
SMTSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 Fund
5.33%5.78%4.87%1.87%10.16%17.65%4.83%11.47%6.11%4.10%2.89%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SMTSX and DRIJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMTSX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to DRIJX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTSX dropped -51.41% vs DRIJX's -33.55%.

DRIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMTSX and DRIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer