SMTH vs. OEFA
SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) and OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMTH is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by ALPS, while OEFA is a International Equity fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index. SMTH is actively managed, while OEFA is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMTH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OEFA.
Performance
SMTH vs. OEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than OEFA's 2.69% return.
SMTH
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OEFA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMTH vs. OEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 1.01% | 0.74% |
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 2.69% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMTH and OEFA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMTH vs. OEFA — Risk / Return Rank
SMTH
OEFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMTH vs. OEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMTH | OEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMTH vs. OEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum OEFA drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and OEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMTH | OEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -13.54% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -3.54% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -3.71% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility
SMTH vs. OEFA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMTH | OEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 17.65% | -13.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 17.65% | -13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 17.65% | -13.07% |
SMTH vs. OEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than OEFA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMTH vs. OEFA - Dividend Comparison
SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than OEFA's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 1.45% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.36% | 4.46% | 4.58% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMTH and OEFA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OEFA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OEFA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SMTH.
SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.45% for OEFA.
SMTH is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while OEFA is International Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 0.48% for OEFA.
Find the right allocation for SMTH and OEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer