SMTH vs. KDRN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) and KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMTH returned 4.43% vs 2.17% for KDRN. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMTH charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for KDRN.

Performance

SMTH vs. KDRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than KDRN's 0.36% return.

SMTH

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KDRN

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.08%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 2.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTH vs. KDRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	1.01%	6.86%	2.76%	3.80%
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	0.36%	4.65%	1.30%	1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTH and KDRN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.80

The correlation between SMTH and KDRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMTH vs. KDRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTH

SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 36
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 34
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 34

KDRN

KDRN Risk / Return Rank: 21
KDRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
KDRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
KDRN Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KDRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
KDRN Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTH vs. KDRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMTH	KDRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.63	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	0.91	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.12	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	1.23	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.64	2.40	+2.24

SMTH vs. KDRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the KDRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTH and KDRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMTH vs. KDRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum KDRN drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and KDRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMTH	KDRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-15.29%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.74%	-1.77%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-1.66%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-4.71%	+3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.90%	+0.06%

Volatility

SMTH vs. KDRN - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMTH	KDRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.12%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	2.15%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	3.47%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.58%	6.58%	-2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.58%	6.58%	-2.00%

SMTH vs. KDRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KDRN's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMTH vs. KDRN - Dividend Comparison

SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than KDRN's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	3.14%	2.54%	2.83%	2.84%	2.11%
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	4.36%	4.46%	4.58%	0.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMTH and KDRN in my portfolio?

SMTH and KDRN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMTH or KDRN?

KDRN has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to SMTH (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTH dropped -4.11% vs KDRN's -15.29%.

Which ETF is better, SMTH or KDRN?

On 1-year performance, SMTH leads with 4.43% vs 2.17% for KDRN. On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMTH or KDRN?

Over the 1-year period, SMTH has performed better with a 4.43% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMTH or KDRN?

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMTH or KDRN?

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 3.14% for KDRN.

What is the main difference between SMTH and KDRN?

They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Kingsbarn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 1.09% for KDRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.