SMTH vs. COMT
SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMTH is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by ALPS, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMTH returned 5.19% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. SMTH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
SMTH vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
SMTH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
SMTH vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.34% | 6.86% | 2.76% | 3.49% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMTH and COMT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | -0.19 |
The correlation between SMTH and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMTH vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMTH
COMT
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
SMTH
COMT
-
Basic Materials
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Communication Services
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Financial Services
SMTH
-
COMT
Healthcare
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Industrials
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Real Estate
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Technology
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Utilities
SMTH
-
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMTH vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
SMTH
COMT
SMTH vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMTH | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.95 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | 14.11 | -8.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMTH | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.24 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.20 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
SMTH vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMTH | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -51.89% | +47.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | -8.02% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -4.82% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -24.07% | +23.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 3.38% | -2.47% |
Volatility
SMTH vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) is 1.31%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SMTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMTH | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 7.37% | -6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 18.80% | -16.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 21.29% | -17.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 21.06% | -16.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 18.89% | -14.30% |
SMTH vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMTH vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.46% | 4.58% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMTH and COMT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SMTH (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTH dropped -4.11% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 5.19% for SMTH. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SMTH has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SMTH.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 4.40% for SMTH.
SMTH is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMTH and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer