SMST vs. AIPO
SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. SMST is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. SMST charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
SMST vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMST achieves a -36.68% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 38.70% return.
SMST
- 1D
- -12.10%
- 1M
- 26.91%
- 6M
- -13.52%
- YTD
- -36.68%
- 1Y
- 223.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- 28.31%
- YTD
- 38.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -36.68% | 342.43% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 38.70% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMST and AIPO is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMST vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
SMST
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMST vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMST vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMST drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.25% | -17.31% | -81.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.51% | -11.76% | -85.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.91% | -4.69% | -86.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.25% | — | — |
Volatility
SMST vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 57.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 149.51% | 35.96% | +113.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.79% | 35.96% | +131.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.79% | 35.96% | +131.83% |
SMST vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMST has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMST vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMST and AIPO have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.
AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.
SMST is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMST and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for SMST and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer