PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSN.L vs. OR.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and L'Oréal S.A. (OR.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMSN.L is traded in USD, while OR.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the OR.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 161.93% return, which is significantly higher than OR.PA's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has outperformed OR.PA with an annualized return of 27.99%, while OR.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.


SMSN.L

1D
6.51%
1M
13.49%
YTD
161.93%
6M
204.19%
1Y
399.27%
3Y*
59.18%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
27.99%

OR.PA

1D
1.71%
1M
8.37%
YTD
6.89%
6M
5.94%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
161.93%130.81%-37.94%38.34%-31.32%-8.01%60.01%41.56%-25.35%62.93%
OR.PA
L'Oréal S.A.
6.89%23.85%-27.74%41.32%-23.72%26.49%29.83%30.73%5.66%26.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSN.L and OR.PA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.22

The correlation between SMSN.L and OR.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSN.L
SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

OR.PA
OR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and L'Oréal S.A. (OR.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMSN.LOR.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.06

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.03

0.36

+17.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.94

0.71

+57.23

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.76, which is higher than the OR.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSN.L and OR.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, roughly equal to the maximum OR.PA drawdown of -57.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and OR.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSN.LOR.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-57.58%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-15.68%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.52%

-32.57%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.12%

-38.89%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-38.89%

-15.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.55%

-5.75%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-10.79%

-6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.85%

8.06%

-1.21%

Volatility

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Volatility Comparison

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 20.71% compared to L'Oréal S.A. (OR.PA) at 6.46%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OR.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSN.LOR.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.71%

6.46%

+14.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.80%

20.54%

+23.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.06%

26.31%

+24.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.83%

26.86%

+7.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.95%

24.22%

+8.73%

Dividends

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Dividend Comparison

SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than OR.PA's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OR.PA
L'Oréal S.A.
1.84%1.91%1.93%1.33%1.44%0.96%1.24%1.46%1.76%3.57%3.58%3.48%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
0.35%0.94%2.88%1.79%2.50%1.85%3.60%2.47%3.65%1.62%1.68%1.71%

Financials

SMSN.L vs. OR.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and L'Oréal S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SMSN.L values in KRW, OR.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


SMSN.L and OR.PA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMSN.L and OR.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer