PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSN.L vs. O
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMSN.L vs. O - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Realty Income Corporation (O). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 149.32% return, which is significantly higher than O's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has outperformed O with an annualized return of 27.10%, while O has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.


SMSN.L

1D
1.28%
1M
5.20%
YTD
149.32%
6M
179.18%
1Y
379.61%
3Y*
57.37%
5Y*
25.51%
10Y*
27.10%

O

1D
-1.36%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.49%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
4.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMSN.L vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
149.32%130.81%-37.94%38.34%-31.32%-8.01%60.01%41.56%-25.35%62.93%
O
Realty Income Corporation
8.78%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSN.L and O is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.07

Fundamentals

EPS

SMSN.L:

$320.04K

O:

$1.17

PE Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.02

O:

51.10

PEG Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

O:

4.16

PS Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

O:

6.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$389.99T

O:

$5.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$152.35T

O:

$3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$68.67T

O:

$3.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSN.L vs. O — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSN.L
SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSN.L vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMSN.LODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.14

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.15

1.19

+15.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.85

2.93

+53.93

SMSN.L vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.44, which is higher than the O Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSN.L and O, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMSN.LODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.44

0.82

+6.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.13

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.17

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.48

+0.04

Drawdowns

SMSN.L vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and O.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSN.LODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-48.45%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-11.10%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.52%

-26.49%

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.12%

-34.48%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-48.28%

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.96%

-10.00%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-9.21%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

4.50%

+2.12%

Volatility

SMSN.L vs. O - Volatility Comparison

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 23.24% compared to Realty Income Corporation (O) at 4.81%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSN.LODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.24%

4.81%

+18.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.27%

11.89%

+31.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.70%

16.10%

+34.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.66%

18.89%

+15.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

25.64%

+7.24%

Dividends

SMSN.L vs. O - Dividend Comparison

SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than O's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.39%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
0.37%0.94%2.88%1.79%2.50%1.85%3.60%2.47%3.65%1.62%1.68%1.71%

Financials

SMSN.L vs. O - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00T40.00T60.00T80.00T100.00T120.00T140.00T20222023202420252026
133.87T
1.55B
(SMSN.L) Total Revenue
(O) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SMSN.L vs. O - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Realty Income Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
61.2%
0
Portfolio components
SMSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

O - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SMSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.

O - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SMSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.

O - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a net income of -9.17M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -0.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMSN.L and O have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMSN.L and O

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer