SMRI vs. SEIV
SMRI (Bushido Capital US Equity ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMRI returned 35.67% vs 44.72% for SEIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMRI charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.
Performance
SMRI vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMRI having a 18.58% return and SEIV slightly lower at 18.28%.
SMRI
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 6M
- 18.82%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 21.23%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMRI vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 18.58% | 17.41% | 19.16% | 5.11% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 18.28% | 27.43% | 19.73% | 9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMRI and SEIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SMRI and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMRI vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank
SMRI
SEIV
SMRI vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMRI | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.64 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 6.47 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.62 | 26.41 | -9.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMRI | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 3.60 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
SMRI vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMRI drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, roughly equal to the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRI and SEIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMRI | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -18.18% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -6.95% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.85% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -3.48% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.70% | +0.45% |
Volatility
SMRI vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) at 4.10%. This indicates that SMRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMRI | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 4.10% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 9.08% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 12.49% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 16.68% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 16.68% | -0.84% |
SMRI vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMRI has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMRI vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison
SMRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SEIV's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.32% | 0.98% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMRI and SEIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMRI has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to SEIV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMRI dropped -18.45% vs SEIV's -18.18%.
On 1-year performance, SEIV leads with 44.72% vs 35.67% for SMRI. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 44.72% return vs 35.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.
SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.95% for SMRI.
They also come from different issuers: Bushido and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for SMRI and 0.15% for SEIV.
SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMRI and SEIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer