SMRI vs. FTA
SMRI (Bushido Capital US Equity ETF) and FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. SMRI is actively managed, while FTA is passively managed. Over the past year, SMRI returned 40.59% vs 31.73% for FTA. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMRI charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTA.
Performance
SMRI vs. FTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMRI achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly higher than FTA's 18.18% return.
SMRI
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- YTD
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 40.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.95%
FTA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 31.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.06M | $3.30M | $2.95M | |
| $770.42K | $508.81K | $403.01K |
SMRI vs. FTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 23.03% | 17.41% | 19.16% | 5.27% |
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 18.18% | 14.94% | 10.13% | 7.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMRI and FTA is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SMRI and FTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMRI vs. FTA — Risk / Return Rank
SMRI
FTA
SMRI vs. FTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMRI | FTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.46 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.75 | 5.93 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.88 | 20.26 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMRI vs. FTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMRI drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, smaller than the maximum FTA drawdown of -62.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRI and FTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMRI | FTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -62.45% | +44.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -5.13% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.56% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -8.97% | +6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.50% | +0.82% |
Volatility
SMRI vs. FTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) is 3.61%, while First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that SMRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMRI | FTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.93% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 8.04% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 11.61% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 16.23% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 19.85% | -4.01% |
SMRI vs. FTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMRI has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FTA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMRI vs. FTA - Dividend Comparison
SMRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than FTA's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.61% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 0.86% | 1.32% | 0.98% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMRI and FTA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SMRI (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMRI dropped -18.45% vs FTA's -62.45%.
On 1-year performance, SMRI leads with 40.59% vs 31.73% for FTA. On fees, FTA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SMRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMRI has performed better with a 40.59% return vs 31.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.
FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.86% for SMRI.
They also come from different issuers: Bushido and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for SMRI and 0.60% for FTA.
SMRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMRI and FTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer