PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMQFX vs. SMSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMQFX achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly higher than SMSAX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SMQFX has outperformed SMSAX with an annualized return of 12.11%, while SMSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.80% annualized return.


SMQFX

1D
1.21%
1M
8.17%
YTD
26.81%
6M
30.55%
1Y
60.61%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.11%

SMSAX

1D
0.56%
1M
3.09%
YTD
7.33%
6M
8.20%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
26.81%40.14%9.19%16.67%-19.31%8.09%17.33%18.91%-17.67%33.53%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
7.33%10.62%6.42%7.21%-4.95%1.47%12.06%4.85%-3.68%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMQFX and SMSAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.63

The correlation between SMQFX and SMSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMQFX vs. SMSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMQFX
SMQFX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SMQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SMQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SMSAX
SMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMQFXSMSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.62

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

4.63

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.04

20.00

-1.96

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMQFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is comparable to the SMSAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMQFX and SMSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMQFXSMSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73

3.14

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.06

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

1.05

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.78

-0.22

Drawdowns

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMQFX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than SMSAX's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMQFX and SMSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMQFXSMSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-10.98%

-29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-3.66%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-5.93%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

-9.72%

-26.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-10.98%

-29.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.06%

-2.11%

-9.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

0.85%

+2.55%

Volatility

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) at 1.96%. This indicates that SMQFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMQFXSMSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

1.96%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

4.29%

+9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

5.40%

+11.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

4.67%

+13.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

4.61%

+12.31%

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMQFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SMSAX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMQFX vs. SMSAX - Dividend Comparison

SMQFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.84%, more than SMSAX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
23.84%30.23%6.43%3.24%5.32%17.70%1.80%1.89%11.55%2.70%2.15%1.69%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
4.73%5.08%5.54%4.35%2.13%7.61%2.79%1.01%4.94%2.20%0.07%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMQFX and SMSAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMQFX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to SMSAX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMQFX dropped -40.14% vs SMSAX's -10.98%.

SMQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMQFX and SMSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer