SMSAX vs. ENIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX).
SMSAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Mar 30, 2010. ENIAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Dec 13, 2006.
Performance
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMSAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund | 2.01% | 10.62% | 6.42% | 7.21% | -4.95% | 1.47% | 12.06% | 4.85% | -3.68% | 5.26% |
ENIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund | 0.38% | 6.14% | 8.34% | 7.94% | -1.16% | 2.67% | 2.47% | 5.82% | 1.82% | 3.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMSAX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than ENIAX's 0.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMSAX having a 4.36% annualized return and ENIAX not far behind at 4.17%.
SMSAX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
ENIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 4.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMSAX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ENIAX's 0.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMSAX vs. ENIAX — Risk / Return Rank
SMSAX
ENIAX
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMSAX | ENIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 1.89 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 2.45 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.41 | -0.93 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 2.54 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 11.20 | +2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMSAX | ENIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.89 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 1.61 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 1.50 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMSAX and ENIAX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Dividend Comparison
SMSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than ENIAX's 5.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMSAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund | 4.98% | 5.08% | 5.54% | 4.35% | 2.13% | 7.61% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 4.94% | 2.20% | 0.07% | 2.66% |
ENIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund | 5.98% | 6.00% | 6.78% | 5.33% | 4.07% | 2.66% | 2.96% | 4.32% | 3.96% | 3.02% | 2.75% | 2.54% |
Drawdowns
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMSAX drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum ENIAX drawdown of -33.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSAX and ENIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMSAX | ENIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -33.30% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.73% | -2.11% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.72% | -3.52% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.98% | -13.45% | +2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | 0.00% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -7.86% | +5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.48% | +0.53% |
Volatility
SMSAX vs. ENIAX - Volatility Comparison
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX) at 0.36%. This indicates that SMSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMSAX | ENIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 0.36% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | 0.66% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.83% | 2.85% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 2.86% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 2.78% | +1.77% |