PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMQFX vs. CAVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMQFX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than CAVAX's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SMQFX has underperformed CAVAX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while CAVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


SMQFX

1D
3.48%
1M
-1.44%
6M
6.52%
YTD
16.94%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
10.49%
ALL TIME*
8.42%

CAVAX

1D
1.80%
1M
2.08%
6M
7.79%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
11.86%
ALL TIME*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
16.94%40.14%9.19%16.67%-19.31%8.09%17.33%18.91%-17.67%33.53%
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
10.15%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SMQFX and CAVAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.69

The correlation between SMQFX and CAVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMQFX vs. CAVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMQFX
SMQFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SMQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SMQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMQFXCAVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.07

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

8.56

-0.14

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMQFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the CAVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMQFX and CAVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMQFX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than CAVAX's maximum drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMQFX and CAVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMQFXCAVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-36.55%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-8.49%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-17.95%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

-26.51%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-36.55%

-3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

0.00%

-7.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-5.01%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

2.06%

+2.08%

Volatility

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SMQFX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) at 3.51%. This indicates that SMQFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMQFXCAVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

3.51%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

9.66%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.05%

12.48%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

16.16%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.31%

-0.08%

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMQFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CAVAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMQFX vs. CAVAX - Dividend Comparison

SMQFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.85%, more than CAVAX's 6.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.11%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
SMQFX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
25.85%30.23%6.43%3.24%5.32%17.70%1.80%1.89%11.55%2.70%2.15%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMQFX and CAVAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMQFX has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to CAVAX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMQFX dropped -40.14% vs CAVAX's -36.55%.

SMQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMQFX and CAVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer