SMPIX vs. UGPIX
SMPIX (ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class) and UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, SMPIX returned 18.34%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for UGPIX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMPIX charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UGPIX.
Performance
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMPIX achieves a 64.41% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -37.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SMPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 18.34%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.96% annualized return.
SMPIX
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 57.17%
- YTD
- 64.41%
- 1Y
- 110.00%
- 3Y*
- -10.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -46.85%
- YTD
- -37.93%
- 1Y
- -28.33%
- 3Y*
- -13.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.96%
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPIX ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class | 64.41% | 56.35% | -77.32% | 155.37% | -54.31% | 80.17% | 60.77% | 77.97% | -17.56% | 42.78% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -37.93% | 36.28% | -21.79% | 785.09% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMPIX and UGPIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, SMPIX and UGPIX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
SMPIX
UGPIX
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class (SMPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.90 | -0.44 | +5.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.34 | -0.84 | +14.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.52%, roughly equal to the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMPIX and UGPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.52% | -98.56% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.72% | -65.51% | +42.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.52% | -65.51% | -29.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.52% | -91.09% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.52% | -96.22% | +1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.18% | -82.34% | +7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.68% | -79.76% | +22.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.32% | 34.41% | -26.09% |
Volatility
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class (SMPIX) has a higher volatility of 24.20% compared to ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) at 15.53%. This indicates that SMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.20% | 15.53% | +8.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.31% | 38.06% | +5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.25% | 53.17% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.81% | 387.98% | -316.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.76% | 276.45% | -216.69% |
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMPIX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison
SMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, less than UGPIX's 9.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPIX ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class | 7.92% | 13.02% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.57% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 40.03% | 0.11% | 0.45% | 0.68% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 9.74% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMPIX has higher volatility (24.20%) compared to UGPIX (15.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMPIX dropped -94.52% vs UGPIX's -98.56%.
SMPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMPIX and UGPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer