SMPIX vs. SLMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund (SMPIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX).
SMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983.
Performance
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPIX ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund | -12.60% | 56.35% | 81.41% | 155.37% | -54.31% | 80.17% | 60.77% | 77.97% | -17.56% | 42.78% |
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 0.17% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMPIX achieves a -12.60% return, which is significantly lower than SLMCX's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SMPIX has outperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 38.18%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.20% annualized return.
SMPIX
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- -13.64%
- YTD
- -12.60%
- 6M
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- 90.38%
- 3Y*
- 60.03%
- 5Y*
- 35.76%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
SLMCX
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 58.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMPIX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank
SMPIX
SLMCX
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund (SMPIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMPIX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.90 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 2.46 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.54 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 13.44 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMPIX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.90 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.64 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.86 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.69 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMPIX and SLMCX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison
SMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, more than SLMCX's 9.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPIX ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund | 14.89% | 13.02% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.57% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 40.03% | 0.11% | 0.45% | 0.68% |
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 9.44% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
Drawdowns
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.09%, which is greater than SLMCX's maximum drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMPIX and SLMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMPIX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.09% | -68.10% | -25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.78% | -14.88% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.09% | -37.32% | -56.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.09% | -37.32% | -56.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.78% | -11.96% | -73.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.42% | -13.05% | -44.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 3.93% | +4.03% |
Volatility
SMPIX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund (SMPIX) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) at 9.50%. This indicates that SMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMPIX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.41% | 9.50% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.10% | 21.01% | +15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.32% | 30.59% | +27.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 332.53% | 25.96% | +306.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 237.07% | 25.93% | +211.14% |