SMOT vs. RSHO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMOT (VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. SMOT is passively managed, while RSHO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMOT returned 11.98%/yr vs 31.02%/yr for RSHO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMOT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.

Performance

SMOT vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 33.69% return.

SMOT

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 6M: 7.50%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSHO

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: 33.69%
• 6M: 33.85%
• 1Y: 57.71%
• 3Y*: 31.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOT vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF	7.04%	6.46%	10.71%	16.40%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	33.69%	19.23%	17.28%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOT and RSHO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.81

The correlation between SMOT and RSHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMOT vs. RSHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMOT	RSHO
Technology	22.2%	11.4%
Healthcare	18.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	3.7%
Industrials	12.0%	73.1%
Basic Materials	8.1%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	-
Financial Services	6.0%	0.9%
Energy	4.7%	1.0%
Utilities	2.7%	-
Real Estate	2.6%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

SMOT vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOT

SMOT Risk / Return Rank: 35
SMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

RSHO

RSHO Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RSHO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RSHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSHO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOT vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMOT	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.44	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	3.28	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.40	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	3.96	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	15.16	-9.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMOT vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOT and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMOT	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	2.44	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	1.48	-0.77

Drawdowns

SMOT vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and RSHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMOT	RSHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.36%	-27.31%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-14.64%	+5.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-27.31%	+3.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	0.00%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-4.32%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	3.82%	-1.04%

Volatility

SMOT vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is 3.03%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that SMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMOT	RSHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	9.22%	-6.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	20.09%	-10.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	23.74%	-9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.42%	22.55%	-4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	22.55%	-4.13%

SMOT vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMOT vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than RSHO's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%	0.00%
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF	1.28%	1.37%	1.18%	0.65%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMOT and RSHO in my portfolio?

SMOT and RSHO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMOT or RSHO?

RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to SMOT (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

Which ETF is better, SMOT or RSHO?

On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 31.02% vs 11.98% for SMOT. On fees, SMOT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SMOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMOT or RSHO?

Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 31.02% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMOT or RSHO?

SMOT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMOT or RSHO?

SMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.22% for RSHO.

What is the main difference between SMOT and RSHO?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.75% for RSHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.