FNY vs. COWZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNY returned 7.06%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for COWZ. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FNY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

FNY vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNY having a 12.14% return and COWZ slightly lower at 11.74%.

FNY

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -4.39%
• 6M: 7.99%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: 15.84%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 12.99%
• ALL TIME*: 11.35%

COWZ

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 4.89%
• 6M: 7.97%
• YTD: 11.74%
• 1Y: 23.82%
• 3Y*: 11.64%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	$65.11M	$58.70M	$60.07M
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	$2.35M	$2.51M	$2.64M

FNY vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	12.14%	14.03%	18.09%	21.13%	-23.80%	13.46%	36.97%	32.54%	-7.53%	25.12%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	11.74%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FNY and COWZ is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FNY and COWZ has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FNY vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNY	COWZ
Industrials	24.1%	8.4%
Healthcare	20.2%	19.9%
Technology	18.9%	22.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	14.3%
Financial Services	9.3%	-
Real Estate	5.9%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	10.6%
Energy	1.8%	11.2%
Basic Materials	1.5%	4.0%
Utilities	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

FNY vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNY

FNY Risk / Return Rank: 43
FNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FNY Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FNY Martin Ratio Rank: 49

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 85
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNY vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNY	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.93	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.86	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.34	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	3.83	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	11.22	-5.53

FNY vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNY and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNY vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNY drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNY and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNY	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.91%	-38.63%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.01%	-5.95%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.97%	-22.00%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.94%	-22.00%	-11.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.75%	-1.40%	-6.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-4.77%	-2.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	2.03%	+1.75%

Volatility

FNY vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 5.04%. This indicates that FNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNY	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	5.04%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.50%	8.74%	+7.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.29%	11.91%	+9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	17.69%	+4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	19.86%	+2.60%

FNY vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNY vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

FNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.85%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%	0.00%
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.00%	0.03%	0.56%	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.25%	0.28%	0.06%	0.21%	0.60%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNY and COWZ in my portfolio?

FNY and COWZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNY or COWZ?

FNY has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to COWZ (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNY dropped -38.91% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which ETF is better, FNY or COWZ?

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.98% vs 7.06% for FNY. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNY or COWZ?

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNY or COWZ?

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNY or COWZ?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for FNY.

What is the main difference between FNY and COWZ?

FNY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. FNY tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNY and 0.49% for COWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.