SMOG vs. RAYS
SMOG (VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF) and RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - SMOG tracks the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index while RAYS tracks the Solactive Solar Index. Both are passively managed. SMOG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYS.
Performance
SMOG vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMOG
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 42.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMOG vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 9.66% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
SMOG vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOG
RAYS
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
SMOG
RAYS
Industrials
SMOG
RAYS
Consumer Cyclical
SMOG
RAYS
Technology
SMOG
RAYS
Energy
SMOG
RAYS
-
Basic Materials
SMOG
RAYS
Financial Services
SMOG
RAYS
-
Communication Services
SMOG
-
RAYS
-
Consumer Defensive
SMOG
-
RAYS
-
Healthcare
SMOG
-
RAYS
-
Real Estate
SMOG
-
RAYS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOG vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank
SMOG
RAYS
SMOG vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMOG | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOG | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SMOG vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and RAYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOG | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.39% | 0.00% | -84.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.61% | 0.00% | -14.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.47% | 0.00% | -52.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | — | — |
Volatility
SMOG vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOG | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 0.00% | +20.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 0.00% | +25.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 0.00% | +25.73% |
SMOG vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOG vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison
SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.33% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, RAYS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAYS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.
SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.50% for RAYS.
Find the right allocation for SMOG and RAYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer