PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOG vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOG vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SMOG has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 12.89%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


SMOG

1D
-3.46%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.00%
1Y
33.70%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
12.89%

IVV

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.25%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOG vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
10.83%33.36%-9.33%1.42%-29.92%-2.75%118.38%38.86%-10.18%22.69%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.20%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOG and IVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2007

0.71

The correlation between SMOG and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMOG vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOG
IVV

Utilities

34.4%
2.1%

Industrials

30.1%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

20.6%
9.9%

Technology

7.4%
39.0%

Energy

5.6%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.7%

Financial Services

0.6%
11.1%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

SMOG
34.4%
IVV
2.1%

Industrials

SMOG
30.1%
IVV
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SMOG
20.6%
IVV
9.9%

Technology

SMOG
7.4%
IVV
39.0%

Energy

SMOG
5.6%
IVV
3.1%

Basic Materials

SMOG
1.3%
IVV
1.7%

Financial Services

SMOG
0.6%
IVV
11.1%

Communication Services

SMOG

-

IVV
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMOG

-

IVV
4.5%

Healthcare

SMOG

-

IVV
8.3%

Real Estate

SMOG

-

IVV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOG vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOG
SMOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOG vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMOGIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.68

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

11.98

-2.28

SMOG vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOGIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-55.25%

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-8.89%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-18.75%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-24.53%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-33.90%

-17.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.91%

-3.14%

-16.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.37%

-10.76%

-41.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

1.99%

+1.49%

Volatility

SMOG vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.88%. This indicates that SMOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOGIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.15%

4.88%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

9.85%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

12.48%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.36%

16.98%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

18.07%

+7.67%

SMOG vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOG vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.11%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.42%1.57%1.64%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOG and IVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMOG has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to IVV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs 12.89% for SMOG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 12.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.

SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.

SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOG and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer