PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOG vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMOG having a 12.70% annualized return and GLD not far ahead at 13.12%.


SMOG

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.08%
YTD
18.16%
6M
17.43%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
12.70%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
18.16%33.36%-9.33%1.42%-29.92%-2.75%118.38%38.86%-10.18%22.69%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOG and GLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.13

The correlation between SMOG and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMOG vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOG
GLD

Utilities

33.2%

-

Industrials

28.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

21.7%

-

Technology

8.4%

-

Energy

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

SMOG
33.2%
GLD

-

Industrials

SMOG
28.1%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMOG
21.7%
GLD

-

Technology

SMOG
8.4%
GLD

-

Energy

SMOG
6.6%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

SMOG
1.2%
GLD
100.0%

Financial Services

SMOG
0.6%
GLD

-

Communication Services

SMOG

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

SMOG

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

SMOG

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

SMOG

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOG
SMOG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMOGGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

1.68

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

4.15

+9.46

SMOG vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMOGGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.21

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

1.01

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.60

-0.53

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOGGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-45.56%

-38.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-19.21%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-19.21%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-21.03%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-22.00%

-29.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-17.75%

+3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.47%

-16.16%

-36.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

7.73%

-4.63%

Volatility

SMOG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that SMOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOGGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

5.51%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

23.16%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

26.61%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

18.00%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

15.95%

+9.78%

SMOG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.33%1.57%1.64%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOG and GLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMOG has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 12.70% for SMOG. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.

SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while GLD is Gold. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.40% for GLD.

SMOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOG and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer