SMOG vs. CIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).
SMOG and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMOG is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Ardour Global Index. It was launched on May 3, 2007. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both SMOG and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMOG or CIBR.
Correlation
The correlation between SMOG and CIBR is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SMOG vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SMOG:
0.52
CIBR:
0.85
SMOG:
0.88
CIBR:
1.30
SMOG:
1.11
CIBR:
1.17
SMOG:
0.24
CIBR:
1.02
SMOG:
1.62
CIBR:
3.67
SMOG:
7.71%
CIBR:
5.61%
SMOG:
24.10%
CIBR:
24.28%
SMOG:
-84.39%
CIBR:
-33.89%
SMOG:
-43.33%
CIBR:
-9.19%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 2.94% return.
SMOG
4.58%
0.35%
-1.43%
10.52%
9.57%
6.24%
CIBR
2.94%
1.08%
7.01%
19.37%
18.17%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMOG vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMOG vs. CIBR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SMOG
CIBR
SMOG vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMOG vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than CIBR's 0.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOG VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% | 0.21% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.30% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.22% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMOG vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and CIBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMOG vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) is 13.62%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 14.77%. This indicates that SMOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.