SMN vs. SOXL
SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SMN tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMN returned -24.60%/yr vs 58.09%/yr for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
SMN vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -20.64% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 334.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SMN has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -24.60%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 58.09% annualized return.
SMN
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- -20.64%
- 6M
- -25.54%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- -15.70%
- 5Y*
- -13.64%
- 10Y*
- -24.60%
SOXL
- 1D
- -30.51%
- 1M
- 10.06%
- YTD
- 334.31%
- 6M
- 292.56%
- 1Y
- 873.79%
- 3Y*
- 104.66%
- 5Y*
- 36.47%
- 10Y*
- 58.09%
SMN vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -20.64% | -17.96% | 7.37% | -20.23% | -3.03% | -45.83% | -55.75% | -33.63% | 32.74% | -38.03% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 334.31% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and SOXL is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | -0.61 |
The correlation between SMN and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.61 (all time) to -0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
SOXL
SMN vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMN | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.59 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 20.30 | -21.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 68.57 | -69.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMN | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 8.26 | -9.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.34 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | 0.59 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.47 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
SMN vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -90.46% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.52% | -43.47% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.71% | -87.88% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | -90.46% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.39% | -90.46% | -4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -34.93% | -64.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.55% | -35.01% | -55.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.45% | 12.85% | +8.60% |
Volatility
SMN vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) is 10.97%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 55.19%. This indicates that SMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 55.19% | -44.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.86% | 89.77% | -62.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.06% | 106.94% | -72.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.57% | 108.10% | -68.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.91% | 99.53% | -56.62% |
SMN vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMN vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than SOXL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 4.43% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.04% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMN and SOXL have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (55.19%) compared to SMN (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 58.09% vs -24.60% for SMN. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SMN has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 58.09% return vs -24.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.
SMN has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.04% for SOXL.
SMN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.26 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMN and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer