PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. HDLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly lower than HDLB's 25.12% return.


SMLV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
6M
16.25%
YTD
23.05%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
11.09%

HDLB

1D
-0.60%
1M
6.28%
6M
12.18%
YTD
25.12%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
29.45%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$77.42K$57.41K$57.55K
$451.73K$474.34K$539.60K

SMLV vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
23.05%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%4.73%
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
25.12%27.26%28.21%-4.12%-11.46%62.67%-50.94%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and HDLB is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between SMLV and HDLB has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMLV vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVHDLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

1.74

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

3.74

+9.22

SMLV vs. HDLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the HDLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and HDLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, smaller than the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and HDLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVHDLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-78.70%

+36.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-16.17%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-20.94%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-43.81%

+23.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-5.63%

+4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-27.01%

+21.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

7.51%

-5.01%

Volatility

SMLV vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.67%, while ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVHDLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

11.39%

-7.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

22.35%

-12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

28.72%

-13.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

31.06%

-12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.90%

43.43%

-22.53%

SMLV vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than HDLB's 10.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
10.19%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.21%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and HDLB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDLB has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to SMLV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs HDLB's -78.70%.

On 5-year performance, HDLB leads with 14.37% vs 10.12% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HDLB has performed better with a 14.37% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.

HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 10.19%, compared with 2.21% for SMLV.

SMLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while HDLB is Leveraged Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 1.65% for HDLB.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and HDLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer