SMLL vs. SMCP
SMLL (Harbor Active Small Cap ETF) and SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMLL is actively managed, while SMCP is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMLL charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SMCP.
Performance
SMLL vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMLL
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- -1.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCP
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -25.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLL vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | -1.36% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | -25.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLL and SMCP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.21 |
SMLL vs. SMCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLL
SMCP
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
SMLL
SMCP
Financial Services
SMLL
SMCP
Technology
SMLL
SMCP
Consumer Cyclical
SMLL
SMCP
Energy
SMLL
SMCP
Basic Materials
SMLL
SMCP
Healthcare
SMLL
SMCP
Real Estate
SMLL
SMCP
Consumer Defensive
SMLL
SMCP
Utilities
SMLL
SMCP
Communication Services
SMLL
-
SMCP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLL vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank
SMLL
SMCP
SMLL vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLL | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLL | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -1.43 | +1.59 |
Drawdowns
SMLL vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLL drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum SMCP drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLL and SMCP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLL | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -27.86% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.47% | -25.99% | +14.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -5.33% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.60% | — | — |
Volatility
SMLL vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLL | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 43.62% | -26.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 43.62% | -23.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 43.62% | -23.23% |
SMLL vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLL vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison
SMLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 2.33% | 2.37% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLL and SMCP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMLL is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMLL is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.
SMLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and AlphaMark Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SMLL and 0.90% for SMCP.
Find the right allocation for SMLL and SMCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer