SMLL vs. BBSC
SMLL (Harbor Active Small Cap ETF) and BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMLL is actively managed, while BBSC is passively managed. Over the past year, SMLL returned 1.28% vs 41.19% for BBSC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMLL charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBSC.
Performance
SMLL vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLL achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than BBSC's 20.14% return.
SMLL
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 1.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBSC
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 20.14%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 41.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SMLL vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 3.28% | -6.31% | 11.18% |
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 20.14% | 10.38% | 4.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLL and BBSC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SMLL and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLL vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLL
BBSC
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
SMLL
BBSC
Financial Services
SMLL
BBSC
Technology
SMLL
BBSC
Consumer Cyclical
SMLL
BBSC
Energy
SMLL
BBSC
Basic Materials
SMLL
BBSC
Healthcare
SMLL
BBSC
Real Estate
SMLL
BBSC
Consumer Defensive
SMLL
BBSC
Utilities
SMLL
BBSC
Communication Services
SMLL
-
BBSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLL vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank
SMLL
BBSC
SMLL vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMLL | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 4.34 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 14.18 | -14.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMLL vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLL drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum BBSC drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLL and BBSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLL | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -30.96% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.53% | -9.54% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | 0.00% | -10.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -11.39% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 2.91% | +4.81% |
Volatility
SMLL vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) is 4.32%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that SMLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLL | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 5.45% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 13.40% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 19.41% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 22.97% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 22.85% | -2.58% |
SMLL vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLL vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison
SMLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than BBSC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% |
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 2.29% | 2.37% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLL and BBSC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBSC has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SMLL (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLL dropped -23.56% vs BBSC's -30.96%.
On 1-year performance, BBSC leads with 41.19% vs 1.28% for SMLL. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SMLL has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 41.19% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SMLL.
SMLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.99% for BBSC.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SMLL and 0.09% for BBSC.
BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLL and BBSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer