SMIZ vs. DBO
SMIZ (Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SMIZ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. SMIZ is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, SMIZ returned 32.64% vs 77.38% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SMIZ charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
SMIZ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIZ achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
SMIZ
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 32.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
SMIZ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF | 16.88% | 12.16% | 17.92% | 16.39% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -17.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIZ and DBO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2023 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SMIZ and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
SMIZ vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMIZ
DBO
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SMIZ
DBO
-
Industrials
SMIZ
DBO
-
Financial Services
SMIZ
DBO
Healthcare
SMIZ
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMIZ
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
SMIZ
DBO
-
Real Estate
SMIZ
DBO
-
Basic Materials
SMIZ
DBO
-
Energy
SMIZ
DBO
-
Utilities
SMIZ
DBO
-
Communication Services
SMIZ
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMIZ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
SMIZ
DBO
SMIZ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 4.28 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.46 | 8.69 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.25 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.02 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
SMIZ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIZ drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIZ and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.04% | -90.18% | +65.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -18.19% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.68% | +52.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -62.25% | +58.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 8.94% | -6.31% |
Volatility
SMIZ vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) is 4.17%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that SMIZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMIZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 12.79% | -8.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 28.32% | -15.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 34.58% | -17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 32.31% | -13.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 31.79% | -12.91% |
SMIZ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMIZ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
SMIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 1.57% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMIZ and DBO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to SMIZ (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIZ dropped -25.04% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 77.38% vs 32.64% for SMIZ. On fees, SMIZ is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, SMIZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 77.38% return vs 32.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMIZ is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.53% for SMIZ.
SMIZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SMIZ and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMIZ and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer