SMIN vs. VPL
SMIN (iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF) and VPL (Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - SMIN tracks the MSCI India Small Cap Index while VPL tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMIN returned 9.63%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for VPL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMIN charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VPL.
Performance
SMIN vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 29.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIN has underperformed VPL with an annualized return of 9.63%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.
SMIN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -3.28%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
VPL
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 29.00%
- 6M
- 31.18%
- 1Y
- 51.22%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
SMIN vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | -3.98% | -6.68% | 16.78% | 35.41% | -14.23% | 44.43% | 19.59% | -5.21% | -25.55% | 62.36% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 29.00% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -14.40% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIN and VPL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012 | 0.46 |
SMIN vs. VPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMIN
VPL
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
SMIN
VPL
Financial Services
SMIN
VPL
Healthcare
SMIN
VPL
Consumer Cyclical
SMIN
VPL
Basic Materials
SMIN
VPL
Technology
SMIN
VPL
Consumer Defensive
SMIN
VPL
Real Estate
SMIN
VPL
Utilities
SMIN
VPL
Communication Services
SMIN
VPL
Energy
SMIN
VPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMIN vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank
SMIN
VPL
SMIN vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIN | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.47 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 3.86 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 15.24 | -15.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIN | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 2.63 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.59 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.34 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SMIN vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and VPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIN | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -55.49% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.54% | -13.33% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -16.35% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -31.09% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.50% | -33.90% | -26.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.02% | -1.26% | -14.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -11.63% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.82% | 3.37% | +7.45% |
Volatility
SMIN vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) is 6.11%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that SMIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMIN | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.23% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.65% | 16.75% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 19.57% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 17.29% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 17.29% | +5.54% |
SMIN vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMIN vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than VPL's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | 2.10% | 2.01% | 6.84% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 2.30% | 0.93% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 2.75% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMIN and VPL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPL has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to SMIN (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs VPL's -55.49%.
On 10-year performance, VPL leads with 10.60% vs 9.63% for SMIN. On fees, VPL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SMIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VPL has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.
VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.10% for SMIN.
SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index, while VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for SMIN and 0.08% for VPL.
VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMIN and VPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer