SMIN vs. UGA
SMIN (iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SMIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Small Cap Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMIN returned 9.63%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for UGA. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMIN charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
SMIN vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIN has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 9.63%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.
SMIN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -3.28%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
SMIN vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | -3.98% | -6.68% | 16.78% | 35.41% | -14.23% | 44.43% | 19.59% | -5.21% | -25.55% | 62.36% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIN and UGA is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012 | 0.10 |
The correlation between SMIN and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMIN vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
SMIN
UGA
SMIN vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIN | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 5.37 | -5.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 12.86 | -13.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIN | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 2.27 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.71 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.12 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SMIN vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIN | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -86.59% | +26.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.54% | -14.88% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -26.68% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -38.11% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.50% | -75.89% | +15.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.02% | -14.75% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -36.76% | +22.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.82% | 6.20% | +4.62% |
Volatility
SMIN vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) is 6.11%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that SMIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMIN | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 11.64% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.65% | 30.48% | -14.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 35.27% | -16.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 34.40% | -15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 37.27% | -14.44% |
SMIN vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMIN vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | 2.10% | 2.01% | 6.84% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 2.30% | 0.93% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMIN and UGA have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to SMIN (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.27% vs 9.63% for SMIN. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SMIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.
SMIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
SMIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for SMIN and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMIN and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer