SMIG vs. VIOV
SMIG (Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF) and VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. SMIG is actively managed, while VIOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMIG returned 13.09%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for VIOV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMIG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIOV.
Performance
SMIG vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
SMIG vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 10.18% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | 5.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and VIOV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SMIG and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMIG vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMIG
VIOV
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
SMIG
VIOV
Consumer Cyclical
SMIG
VIOV
Financial Services
SMIG
VIOV
Industrials
SMIG
VIOV
Energy
SMIG
VIOV
Healthcare
SMIG
VIOV
Basic Materials
SMIG
VIOV
Real Estate
SMIG
VIOV
Utilities
SMIG
VIOV
Consumer Defensive
SMIG
VIOV
Communication Services
SMIG
VIOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
VIOV
SMIG vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.99 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | 13.00 | -9.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.03 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum VIOV drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and VIOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -47.36% | +27.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -9.33% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -28.44% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.28% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -7.38% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.86% | +0.41% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 3.65%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 4.54% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 11.57% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 18.41% | -6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 21.95% | -5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 23.89% | -7.69% |
SMIG vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMIG vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VIOV's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.75% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMIG and VIOV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SMIG (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIG dropped -19.65% vs VIOV's -47.36%.
On 3-year performance, VIOV leads with 14.29% vs 13.09% for SMIG. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SMIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VIOV has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMIG.
SMIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.59% for VIOV.
They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMIG and 0.10% for VIOV.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMIG and VIOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer