SMIG vs. SMCF
Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF).
SMIG and SMCF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. SMCF is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023.
Performance
SMIG vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIG vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.39% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 2.11% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 6.42% | 9.56% | 16.30% | 4.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than SMCF's 6.42% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCF
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIG vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
SMCF
SMIG vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.09 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 1.58 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.55 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 6.16 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.09 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.79 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and SMCF is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIG vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than SMCF's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.68% | 3.91% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum SMCF drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and SMCF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -28.48% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -16.56% | +4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -3.37% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -5.61% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 4.17% | -0.50% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) have volatilities of 4.02% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.02% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 11.96% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 23.41% | -7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 20.84% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 20.84% | -4.51% |