SMIDX vs. HSTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX).
SMIDX is managed by SMI Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2013. HSTRX is managed by Hussman Funds. It was launched on Sep 11, 2002.
Performance
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIDX SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund | -1.27% | 22.50% | 12.76% | 8.39% | -19.12% | 14.00% | 9.64% | 9.47% | -6.12% | 14.11% |
HSTRX Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund | 3.08% | 20.33% | 6.06% | 6.04% | -6.23% | 1.21% | 11.45% | 11.42% | 1.48% | 1.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIDX achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than HSTRX's 3.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMIDX having a 5.70% annualized return and HSTRX not far behind at 5.52%.
SMIDX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.70%
HSTRX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 16.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than HSTRX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIDX vs. HSTRX — Risk / Return Rank
SMIDX
HSTRX
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 2.59 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 3.59 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.53 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 5.30 | -3.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 19.02 | -10.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.59 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.94 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.93 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.86 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIDX and HSTRX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Dividend Comparison
SMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.98%, more than HSTRX's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIDX SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund | 11.98% | 11.83% | 6.43% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 7.91% | 5.32% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 0.92% | 0.25% | 1.27% |
HSTRX Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund | 1.99% | 2.25% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.15% | 1.33% | 0.52% | 1.29% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.25% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIDX drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, which is greater than HSTRX's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIDX and HSTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.99% | -13.53% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -3.14% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.99% | -13.53% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.99% | -13.53% | -8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.73% | -2.08% | -6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -2.70% | -3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 0.87% | +1.20% |
Volatility
SMIDX vs. HSTRX - Volatility Comparison
SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) at 1.21%. This indicates that SMIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 1.21% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 3.21% | +6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 6.61% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 6.46% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 5.96% | +4.09% |