PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMHX vs. CSYU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
-2.14%30.00%17.76%
CSYU.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD
-10.89%20.92%11.40%
Different Trading Currencies

SMHX is traded in USD, while CSYU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSYU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly higher than CSYU.DE's -10.89% return.


SMHX

1D
6.30%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-2.75%
1Y
59.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSYU.DE

1D
1.31%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
-10.89%
6M
-8.14%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
24.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSYU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CSYU.DE
CSYU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHXCSYU.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.03

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

1.55

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

1.41

+1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.92

4.52

+4.40

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHX and CSYU.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHXCSYU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.03

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.66

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and CSYU.DE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while CSYU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, which is greater than CSYU.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and CSYU.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHXCSYU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.53%

-28.65%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.51%

-14.66%

-2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-14.30%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-7.75%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

5.68%

+0.79%

Volatility

SMHX vs. CSYU.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) at 5.11%. This indicates that SMHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSYU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMHXCSYU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.72%

5.11%

+6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.44%

12.63%

+11.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.38%

22.29%

+17.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.83%

22.77%

+17.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.83%

22.77%

+17.06%