PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSYU.DE vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CSYU.DE vs. SMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

CSYU.DE and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSYU.DE is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal. It was launched on Mar 1, 2022. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both CSYU.DE and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSYU.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD		-7.54%7.11%49.10%48.18%-20.13%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		10.52%31.47%48.28%68.18%-17.87%
Different Trading Currencies

CSYU.DE is traded in EUR, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSYU.DE achieves a -7.54% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.15% return.

CSYU.DE

1D
2.22%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-7.54%
6M
-5.26%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

SMH

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
8.15%
6M
16.95%
1Y
68.96%
3Y*
40.43%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
31.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

Often compared with CSYU.DE:
CSYU.DE vs. SMHXCSYU.DE vs. IUIT.LCSYU.DE vs. SOXQCSYU.DE vs. SOXXCSYU.DE vs. VGTCSYU.DE vs. SMGB.LCSYU.DE vs. CSY2.DE
Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSYU.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
CSYU.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD

Return for Risk

CSYU.DE vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSYU.DE
CSYU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSYU.DESMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

1.80

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

2.38

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.34

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

4.02

-2.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

14.72

-11.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSYU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSYU.DE and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSYU.DESMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.80

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.77

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.97

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CSYU.DE and SMH is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CSYU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSYU.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.28%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Drawdowns

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSYU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSYU.DE and SMH.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CSYU.DESMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-84.96%

+56.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.66%

-15.95%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-45.30%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.40%

-8.02%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-41.35%

+33.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

4.47%

+0.77%

Volatility

CSYU.DE vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Tech 125 ESG Universal Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSYU.DE) is 5.09%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that CSYU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CSYU.DESMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

10.54%

-5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

23.86%

-10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.63%

38.51%

-15.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

33.96%

-11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

32.23%

-10.26%