SMHC vs. ISVBF

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SMHC (VanEck China Semiconductor ETF) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - SMHC tracks the MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMHC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.

Performance

SMHC vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMHC

• 1D: -6.17%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISVBF

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: -14.17%
• YTD: -11.22%
• 1Y: -6.37%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: -5.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHC vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF	-15.04%
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHC and ISVBF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.22

Return for Risk

SMHC vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISVBF

ISVBF Risk / Return Rank: 8
ISVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ISVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ISVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ISVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ISVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHC vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMHC	ISVBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.14	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.00	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.42	—

Drawdowns

SMHC vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHC drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, smaller than the maximum ISVBF drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHC and ISVBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMHC	ISVBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.16%	-53.78%	+29.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.16%	-28.04%	+3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-32.63%	+23.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMHC	ISVBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.83%	31.54%	+49.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.83%	30.47%	+50.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.83%	30.12%	+50.71%

SMHC vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMHC vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMHC nor ISVBF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMHC and ISVBF in my portfolio?

SMHC and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMHC or ISVBF?

On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMHC or ISVBF?

ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMHC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMHC or ISVBF?

SMHC and ISVBF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SMHC and ISVBF?

SMHC tracks MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index, while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMHC and 0.40% for ISVBF.