SMHB vs. XDSQ
SMHB (ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMHB is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMHB returned -6.36%/yr vs 9.80%/yr for XDSQ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMHB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMHB achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.80% return.
SMHB
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- -6.36%
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 5.72% | -7.75% | -15.85% | 35.96% | -36.03% | 14.05% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.80% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHB and XDSQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SMHB and XDSQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHB vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
SMHB
XDSQ
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.67 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 7.97 | -6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 1.52 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.65 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.69 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHB drawdown since its inception was -90.30%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHB and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.30% | -26.06% | -64.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.16% | -9.60% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.05% | -19.15% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.85% | -26.06% | -32.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.81% | 0.00% | -41.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.21% | -4.96% | -32.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | 2.01% | +8.37% |
Volatility
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.57%. This indicates that SMHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 0.57% | +6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.74% | 8.40% | +17.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.92% | 10.56% | +28.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 15.27% | +33.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.33% | 15.10% | +51.23% |
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHB vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.00%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 21.00% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHB and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMHB has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to XDSQ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHB dropped -90.30% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.
On 5-year performance, XDSQ leads with 9.80% vs -6.36% for SMHB. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 9.80% return vs -6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SMHB.
SMHB has the higher dividend yield at 21.00%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SMHB and 0.79% for XDSQ.
XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMHB and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer