PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMHB vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMHB vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMHB vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHB achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.


SMHB

1D
2.54%
1M
-7.17%
YTD
-2.38%
6M
-10.57%
1Y
-6.07%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
-5.55%
10Y*

MULL

1D
9.98%
1M
-37.16%
YTD
18.59%
6M
194.62%
1Y
734.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMHB vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMHB vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHB
SMHB Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SMHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHB Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHB vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHBMULLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

5.72

-5.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.18

3.60

-3.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.48

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

13.35

-13.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.61

37.78

-38.38

SMHB vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHB Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHB and MULL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHBMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

5.72

-5.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

1.62

-1.74

Correlation

The correlation between SMHB and MULL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SMHB vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.87%, more than MULL's 0.33% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
22.87%22.22%21.95%15.27%24.18%12.22%16.86%19.97%0.91%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.33%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SMHB vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHB drawdown since its inception was -90.30%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHB and MULL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHBMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.30%

-72.29%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.54%

-53.09%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.27%

-48.41%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-21.94%

-15.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.19%

18.76%

-7.57%

Volatility

SMHB vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) is 14.24%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.04%. This indicates that SMHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMHBMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.24%

47.04%

-32.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.84%

98.50%

-68.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.14%

129.87%

-79.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.02%

129.40%

-80.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.99%

129.40%

-62.41%