SMHB vs. AMND
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND).
SMHB and AMND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMHB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. AMND is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2020. Both SMHB and AMND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SMHB vs. AMND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMHB vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | -2.38% | -7.75% | -15.85% | 35.96% | -36.03% | 68.86% | 70.63% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.42% | 13.60% | 21.27% | 34.91% | 10.45% |
Returns By Period
SMHB
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -10.57%
- 1Y
- -6.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- -5.55%
- 10Y*
- —
AMND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMHB vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMHB vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank
SMHB
AMND
SMHB vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHB and AMND is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SMHB vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison
SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.87%, while AMND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 22.87% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.14% | 6.56% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMHB vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.27% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.19% | — | — |
Volatility
SMHB vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.14% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.02% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.99% | — | — |