SMHB vs. AMND
SMHB (ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B) and AMND (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050) are both exchange-traded funds - SMHB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%), while AMND is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMHB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMND.
Performance
SMHB vs. AMND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMHB
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- -6.36%
- 10Y*
- —
AMND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHB vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 5.72% | -7.75% | -15.85% | 35.96% | -36.03% | 68.86% | 70.63% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.42% | 13.60% | 21.27% | 34.91% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHB and AMND is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SMHB and AMND shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHB vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank
SMHB
AMND
SMHB vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SMHB vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.81% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.21% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | — | — |
Volatility
SMHB vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.33% | — | — |
SMHB vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHB vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison
SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.00%, while AMND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.14% | 6.56% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 21.00% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHB and AMND have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SMHB.
SMHB has the higher dividend yield at 21.00%, compared with 0.00% for AMND.
SMHB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMND is Energy Equities. SMHB tracks Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%), while AMND tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SMHB and 0.75% for AMND.
Find the right allocation for SMHB and AMND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer