SMH vs. ZGD.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and ZGD.TO (BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while ZGD.TO is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Global Gold Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for ZGD.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ZGD.TO.

Performance

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while ZGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than ZGD.TO's -2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed ZGD.TO with an annualized return of 37.49%, while ZGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.15% annualized return.

SMH

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 7.20%
• YTD: 72.15%
• 6M: 75.62%
• 1Y: 141.99%
• 3Y*: 60.05%
• 5Y*: 38.42%
• 10Y*: 37.49%

ZGD.TO

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -18.49%
• YTD: -2.26%
• 6M: -10.13%
• 1Y: 50.26%
• 3Y*: 47.32%
• 5Y*: 22.53%
• 10Y*: 15.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.15%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%
ZGD.TO BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF	-2.16%	155.40%	26.71%	12.81%	-8.15%	-12.55%	29.66%	60.21%	-18.91%	6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and ZGD.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2012	0.07

Over the past year, SMH and ZGD.TO have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMH	ZGD.TO
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMH vs. ZGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ZGD.TO

ZGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 35
ZGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ZGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ZGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ZGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ZGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMH	ZGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.13	1.06	+3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	1.50	+2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.21	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.18	1.45	+7.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.74	4.03	+29.71

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the ZGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and ZGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than ZGD.TO's maximum drawdown of -72.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and ZGD.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	ZGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-72.09%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-34.91%	+19.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	-34.91%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	-46.62%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	-52.46%	+7.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-29.08%	+26.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.04%	-35.46%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	12.51%	-8.45%

Volatility

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is 16.25%, while BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) has a volatility of 17.52%. This indicates that SMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	ZGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.25%	17.52%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.73%	39.25%	-11.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.20%	47.60%	-14.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.47%	37.73%	-2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.82%	38.23%	-5.41%

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ZGD.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. ZGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ZGD.TO's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
ZGD.TO BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF	0.22%	0.22%	0.56%	0.72%	0.73%	0.36%	0.15%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and ZGD.TO in my portfolio?

SMH and ZGD.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMH or ZGD.TO?

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or ZGD.TO?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZGD.TO.

What is the main difference between SMH and ZGD.TO?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while ZGD.TO is Gold. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while ZGD.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Global Gold Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.60% for ZGD.TO.