SMH vs. XOM
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for XOM. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMH vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 37.49%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
SMH vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 23.81% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and XOM is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SMH and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
XOM
SMH vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.26 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 2.45 | +6.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 6.56 | +27.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -62.40% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -15.69% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -18.92% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -20.51% | -24.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -61.34% | +16.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -13.68% | +10.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -10.20% | -30.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 5.84% | -1.78% |
Volatility
SMH vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 9.08%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 9.08% | +7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 20.51% | +7.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 24.51% | +8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 26.77% | +8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 28.20% | +4.62% |
Dividends
SMH vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than XOM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.78% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and XOM have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to XOM (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs XOM's -62.40%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer