PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. XGLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 58.19% return, which is significantly higher than XGLE.L's -1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed XGLE.L with an annualized return of 36.02%, while XGLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower -0.12% annualized return.


SMH

1D
-9.22%
1M
3.63%
YTD
58.19%
6M
56.81%
1Y
127.40%
3Y*
58.39%
5Y*
36.10%
10Y*
36.02%

XGLE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
1.67%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
-3.19%
10Y*
-0.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
58.19%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-1.08%14.08%-4.61%10.17%-23.15%-10.19%14.03%4.55%-3.92%14.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and XGLE.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2009

0.07

The correlation between SMH and XGLE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHXGLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.04

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.58

0.26

+8.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.42

0.68

+31.74

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.00, which is higher than the XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and XGLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHXGLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00

0.20

+3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

-0.31

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

-0.01

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.08

+0.25

Drawdowns

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than XGLE.L's maximum drawdown of -37.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and XGLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHXGLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-37.96%

-47.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-6.28%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-10.32%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-35.39%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-37.96%

-7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.69%

-18.70%

+8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.08%

-12.48%

-28.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

2.45%

+1.49%

Volatility

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHXGLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

2.62%

+12.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.35%

6.33%

+20.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.03%

8.39%

+23.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.24%

10.19%

+25.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.70%

9.18%

+23.52%

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XGLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.19%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while XGLE.L is European Government Bonds. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.15% for XGLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and XGLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer