SMH vs. VDE
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.92%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for VDE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
SMH vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than VDE's 31.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 36.92%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
SMH vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 31.33% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and VDE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SMH and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMH vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
VDE
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMH
VDE
-
Basic Materials
SMH
-
VDE
Communication Services
SMH
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
VDE
-
Energy
SMH
-
VDE
Financial Services
SMH
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
SMH
-
VDE
-
Industrials
SMH
-
VDE
Real Estate
SMH
-
VDE
-
Utilities
SMH
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
VDE
SMH vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.35 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.26 | 3.80 | +5.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | 10.98 | +23.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 2.21 | +2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.77 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 0.32 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.28 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -74.20% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -11.80% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -21.41% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -26.58% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -69.29% | +23.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -7.08% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -19.96% | -21.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 4.08% | -0.12% |
Volatility
SMH vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 6.96%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.45% | 6.96% | +8.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.71% | 16.37% | +10.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 20.36% | +12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.32% | 26.42% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.75% | 29.93% | +2.82% |
SMH vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than VDE's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.39% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and VDE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to VDE (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 9.47% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while VDE is Energy Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.09% for VDE.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer