SMH vs. USTY.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and USTY.L (SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while USTY.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.02%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for USTY.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for USTY.L.

Performance

SMH vs. USTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while USTY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USTY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 58.19% return, which is significantly higher than USTY.L's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed USTY.L with an annualized return of 36.02%, while USTY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.

SMH

• 1D: -9.22%
• 1M: 3.63%
• YTD: 58.19%
• 6M: 56.81%
• 1Y: 127.40%
• 3Y*: 58.39%
• 5Y*: 36.10%
• 10Y*: 36.02%

USTY.L

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: 3.82%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: 1.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. USTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	58.19%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%
USTY.L SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF	0.42%	7.65%	1.64%	3.84%	-12.17%	-1.76%	7.78%	8.38%	1.15%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and USTY.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015	0.03

Return for Risk

SMH vs. USTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 95

USTY.L

USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. USTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMH	USTY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.00	0.94	+3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	1.43	+2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.16	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.58	1.46	+7.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.42	4.56	+27.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMH vs. USTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.00, which is higher than the USTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and USTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMH	USTY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00	0.94	+3.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.04	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.11	0.22	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.26	+0.06

Drawdowns

SMH vs. USTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than USTY.L's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and USTY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	USTY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-18.61%	-66.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-3.42%	-11.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	-5.11%	-30.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	-16.44%	-28.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	-18.61%	-26.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.69%	-3.73%	-6.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.08%	-5.80%	-35.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	1.09%	+2.85%

Volatility

SMH vs. USTY.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) at 1.73%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	USTY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.88%	1.73%	+13.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.35%	3.97%	+22.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.03%	5.33%	+26.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.24%	7.13%	+28.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.70%	6.86%	+25.84%

SMH vs. USTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. USTY.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than USTY.L's 4.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.19%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
USTY.L SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF	4.87%	4.61%	3.81%	2.81%	1.57%	1.31%	2.49%	2.79%	2.11%	2.11%	1.66%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and USTY.L in my portfolio?

SMH and USTY.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMH or USTY.L?

On fees, USTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or USTY.L?

USTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

What is the main difference between SMH and USTY.L?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while USTY.L is Government Bonds. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.05% for USTY.L.